“Some people think they are rich when they have higher indication of wealth, but wealth and richness are not cash and coin every time.”

Beef °

Ranching is conduct of cattlemen in Oklahoma, but the United States federal government permits foreign beef operations like those of the Batista brothers to supplant our domestic beef business. Importing bovines or bovine genetic material to raise South American breeds is not necessary to maintain regionally hardy breeds of cattle as herds in temperate circumstances that are neither too hot nor too cold for their outdoor survival. Oklahoma borders surrounded plentiful grassland after rainfall and researched yields improved feed scientifically, and Oklahoma is neither a pampas country nor a slashed rainforest burned and burnt. Argentina is a plains country with an unruly cowboy culture that differs from that gritted of Oklahoma, and the barbecue culture of Argentina is intelligent and inventive and humbly neighborly; Argentina serves as a counterfactual to the bad ranching culture of Brazil. Coffee culture in Oklahoma City is affected by nefarious ardent deforestation by a competitor called Brazil, a codified set of grocery sales rules, and Oklahoma tax treatment of ranching whereby the chief magistrate can drop the cocked hammer like a gavel and apply statute like a bully neither goring nor cowed.

A United States Ambassador hosted a Brazilian president for an Independence Day event and also talked to that president about protecting Iowa farmers in the ethanol markets, but that man, Todd Chapman, was denounced for doing his job and for representing the President. Chapman did not walk fired at that cookout, but contagion of business bribery and tax evasion is Brazilian cultural externality upon other countries, and not every American enterprise is Odebrecht or a car wash. Batista beef has sold beyond their native Brazil, and a legal dispute has suggested that JBS Foods has sold beef through McDonald’s. Brazilian ranchers are economic asymmetrically against Oklahoma cattlemen not only because the buying power of the dollar is higher in Brazil than in the United States of America, but also because Brazil has wickedly allowed its cowhands to clear land by forest fire and encroach to establish pastureland atrocious if not criminal. Oklahoma can support its cattlemen by formally asking individual business executives and formally demanding upon United States Congressmen to decry Brazil for revealed and proven international corruption and anti-jaguar practices in Amazonia and the Pantanal, and such formal action conducted with determined gubernatorial approval would proffer argumentative traction for state legislators to pass affirmative resolution and then express a true intent to ban all Brazilian ranching and meat business in Oklahoma.

Price and availability of beef in Oklahoma are unfavorable in comparison to price and availability of beef in Brazil and Argentina, and that can be partly addressed by specifically exempting raw beef from sales tax at all markets in Oklahoma and mandating that the exemption be explicitly notated on sales receipts itemizing raw beef. Raw beef does meaningfully cost less abroad, but one fifty-state indicator that Oklahoma shoppers are unsophisticated even in their own currency can be comparative signal response of price spread between the price of chicken thigh and the price of chuck roast. In a Presidential epoch of obvious inflation and inflationary practices, Oklahoma buyers have paid up for beef rather than substituting chicken, and Batista business includes a chicken operation; at least three musketeers were not racketeers. Some people think they are rich when they have higher indication of wealth, but wealth and richness are not cash and coin every time. Unaware Oklahoma shoppers overpay for raw beef without having seen the selection and availability presented at market within competing foreign localities of beef exportation, and communicative gubernatorial support for statewide zeroing of sales tax for cast iron cookware as well as raw beef can start true consideration about beef being priced over chicken, pound for pound, as home economics.

Cattle ranching in Oklahoma is as statutorily protected business, and that is problematic; Oklahoma statute is, considered altogether, a shifty work surface for effortful governance in simultaneity with a state constitution that is neither succinct nor federalist in a context of granular competition against other states at market. Constitutionally, Oklahoma has repeatedly amended without voter knowledge of literal meaning, and separately, reducing taxation for grain business affects trade. Oklahoma imports corn as feed for livestock, and that is a partaking in other states’ economic benefit from national subsidy. Ranching has, in this landlocked state, floated local economic resilience when consumer spending has decreased in times of negative wealth effect and when inflation increases with government obfuscation of benchmark exchange rates; cattle ranchers may export less product and beef prices can become lesser locally in a way that is nonlinear with demand reduction due to interactive effects with the price of diesel fuel for transit of beef cattle, and that is a mathematical reason for how ranching lets locals eat better than otherwise when a nationwide economy worsens. At a government level, incorporating complex interactive defenses into a set of economic practices is like engineering elasticity and toughness into the economy, and the fifty eldest legislators sent from coastal states to Washington, a city, do not necessarily and specifically protect Oklahoma ranching and petroleum industry when the economy experiences shocks.

Legislators of the Democratic Party in Oklahoma can socialize to increase rapport with rancher-county House Representatives and State Senators to introduce an allied bill that addresses all animal husbandry explicitly addressed in the Oklahoma Statutes and amends them into one logically consistent title with modifications throughout statute in a unary omnibus enactment neglecting any constitutional amendment. The Democratic Party does not treat Oklahoma as an ideological battleground for gray matters to flow through the erythrocytic redness that influences Republicans’ gray matter to benefit this country with purity like blood gets purified for its functionality in the human body; the party is not led by ashes. United States Ambassador Todd Chapman was right to do his job in Brazil regarding business competition, international politics, and credentialed embassy, and in Cuenca he visited a previously hospitalized citizen of his country of embassy. Cast iron is not a pioneer woman, and an ox is a bull. God willing, it is possible for Oklahoma to establish statute that dishonors its Democratic Party by attenuating its present whinges and inviting its contemporary legislators to test and try the words of proposed refinement of statute alongside representation of cattleman interests.

#loveYourNeighborAsYourself

Arya Azma

Starbucks Coffee #84790

100 Park Ave Suite 102

Oklahoma City, OK

06/27/2026 08:40 PM